Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 Review

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

jptruck

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2006
Posts
543
Reaction score
20
So, I've had them on for a week or so now. I've driven them in rain, slush, light snow and temps up to about 60 degrees. I'm expecting they are the bomb in the snow, but what I was not expecting was the warm weather, dry condition performance. A couple of points about them:

1) They are quiet. Not sure what I was expecting, but I've had them on the highway at 70+ MPH in the rain and dry and they are no louder than the stock Contis (maybe a bit more noise, but not very noticeable).

2) Steering is good, but a bit more "vague" than standard tires. They are definitely soft underfoot, and you can feel a difference. That said, it's not a drastic change.

3) They are not confidence inspiring in heavy rain. Maybe it's because I've heard/read they have hydroplaning issues, but they feel a little sloppy on super-wet roads at high speeds.

4) The colder the temps, the better they drive. No doubt. Temps in the 20s and below make them feel more normal, performance-wise.

5) Off-road: I did some light grass/mud driving last weekend. As expected, they were pretty grippy. Not a lot of slipping here, but it wasn't anything heavy duty. Normal, I guess.

It's snowing out now, but not heavy enough to accumulate. Can't wait for that, but my biggest fears have been addresses regarding how they drive when it's not snowing outside.
 

PaulLR3

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Posts
1,401
Reaction score
530
Location
Boston
I agree, the colder it gets the better the tires perform. I have to disagree about the hydroplaning. The R2 is far better than the original Hakka SUV R in rain and slush. The rain channels are about twice as wide on the R2 and I have never felt them hydroplane, even in very heavy rain.
 

danrhiggins

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Posts
1,126
Reaction score
81
So, I've had them on for a week or so now. I've driven them in rain, slush, light snow and temps up to about 60 degrees. I'm expecting they are the bomb in the snow, but what I was not expecting was the warm weather, dry condition performance. A couple of points about them:

1) They are quiet. Not sure what I was expecting, but I've had them on the highway at 70+ MPH in the rain and dry and they are no louder than the stock Contis (maybe a bit more noise, but not very noticeable).

2) Steering is good, but a bit more "vague" than standard tires. They are definitely soft underfoot, and you can feel a difference. That said, it's not a drastic change.

3) They are not confidence inspiring in heavy rain. Maybe it's because I've heard/read they have hydroplaning issues, but they feel a little sloppy on super-wet roads at high speeds.

4) The colder the temps, the better they drive. No doubt. Temps in the 20s and below make them feel more normal, performance-wise.

5) Off-road: I did some light grass/mud driving last weekend. As expected, they were pretty grippy. Not a lot of slipping here, but it wasn't anything heavy duty. Normal, I guess.

It's snowing out now, but not heavy enough to accumulate. Can't wait for that, but my biggest fears have been addresses regarding how they drive when it's not snowing outside.

My experience thus far as well. Only one day where I was able to get them in the snow (or rather packed snow/ice). They did well. And on the dryer roads they have been as you describe.
 

aj22

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 21, 2014
Posts
67
Reaction score
3
I got the R2s on Saturday. Drove the stock Contis in snow/slush on Friday, and it wasn't fun. Not quite as bad as I was led to believe, but not good either.

So far, so good. Drove in snow/slush on Saturday, then temperature dropped so drove on some ice and the like on Sunday (all near Killington, VT). Really happy with the performance. Agree with the first post that these are quiet, more so than expected. I think I'm getting better mileage, but not entirely positive. I'll check more closely in the spring when the R2s come off. Dumping rain today, and no issue in the water at all, including some standing water here and there.
As expected, not as good on dry, but even there, better than I expected.

Highly recommended, I only wish I could try some WRG3s for comparison's sake.
 

colorover

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Posts
213
Reaction score
33
I got the R2s on Saturday. Drove the stock Contis in snow/slush on Friday, and it wasn't fun. Not quite as bad as I was led to believe, but not good either.

So far, so good. Drove in snow/slush on Saturday, then temperature dropped so drove on some ice and the like on Sunday (all near Killington, VT). Really happy with the performance. Agree with the first post that these are quiet, more so than expected. I think I'm getting better mileage, but not entirely positive. I'll check more closely in the spring when the R2s come off. Dumping rain today, and no issue in the water at all, including some standing water here and there.
As expected, not as good on dry, but even there, better than I expected.

Highly recommended, I only wish I could try some WRG3s for comparison's sake.

I used the predecessor to the R2 (oddly enough, the R) for six winters and they were phenomenal. Wear was much better than expected for such a soft/aggressive tire, noise and comfort great and snow grip was second to none. I would likely go with the WGRx next time since for our climate here in Colorado, I'd like to have a little more dry performance and better resistance to hydroplaning.
 

danrhiggins

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Posts
1,126
Reaction score
81
I used the predecessor to the R2 (oddly enough, the R) for six winters and they were phenomenal. Wear was much better than expected for such a soft/aggressive tire, noise and comfort great and snow grip was second to none. I would likely go with the WGRx next time since for our climate here in Colorado, I'd like to have a little more dry performance and better resistance to hydroplaning.

Nice to see a fellow Coloradoan on the forum! I have the R2s. But you are right that we get more drive pavement here than most think. I'm heading up to Rocky Mountain NP tomorrow but even then I don't know how much snow I'll actually encounter. Of course it is still "early" in our season.

I do like these tires, though.
 

RBA

Full Access Member
Joined
May 23, 2010
Posts
178
Reaction score
8
I just went to the tire configurator on Nokian site and the Hakkapalitta R2 are the only tires that fit the LR4 19's. Bummer..I was hoping for more options.
 

aj22

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 21, 2014
Posts
67
Reaction score
3
I just went to the tire configurator on Nokian site and the Hakkapalitta R2 are the only tires that fit the LR4 19's. Bummer..I was hoping for more options.

The WRGs fit also, but I believe that's it, not including one studded set.
 

danrhiggins

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Posts
1,126
Reaction score
81
The Hakkapeliittas worked great driving over Squaw Pass west of Denver this past week.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0598.jpg
    IMG_0598.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 65

jptruck

Full Access Member
Joined
May 4, 2006
Posts
543
Reaction score
20
I have to say, these things are pretty impressive in the snow (now that I've had a chance to really test them). Hardpack is like driving on road. Ice is ice, but better than the non-snows. Slush is the only issue, but it's an issue for any tire.

I tried my hardest to get sideways this morning in all sorts of road conditions. The tires just glued themselves to the surface. A little slip here and there, but with these tires and snow mode, I almost feel too confident.
 

Attachments

  • Hakkas.jpg
    Hakkas.jpg
    90.4 KB · Views: 42

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
36,254
Posts
217,947
Members
30,493
Latest member
A562NV
Top