Drove the new Discovery and I'm totally confused now.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Surfrider77

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Posts
900
Reaction score
127
A few thoughts from an owner with combined ~150k miles in an LR3 and SCV6 LR4. We've had our LR4 loaded with people, dog, luggage, and drag from skis on the roof, and the SCV6 has been excellent. Effortless at highway speeds up to and over 80mph, climbing steep grades at high altitude. I'd love a V8, but I think a lot of the negative comments have more to do with the *thought* of downgrading the power v. their actual performance. The 8 speed is a gem and keeps the engine nicely in its sweet spot, without a lot of hunting. Short of a 400+ hp V8, this engine wins. Only thing I truly do not like is the rotary shift knob...

I have heard this argument before, but the truth is, the transmission is working the magic for you. The engine is down on hp / tq no matter how you cut it. The fact is, they could have mated the new transmission to the V8 and people would have been happy too. I am glad the combo worked for some people, but I would never trade my V8 for that thing.
 

Surfrider77

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Posts
900
Reaction score
127
The SCV6 was derived from the 5.0 V8, hardly a dinosaur.

New Jaguar V8 revealed in Detroit

That design makes lots of torque early in the power band and better matches a vehicle targeted at off-road vs. smaller turbo engines that lag and produce less torque.

For offroad and towing I'll take displacement or supercharging over turbo any day.

You are quoting an article from 2009. Don't know how you cut it, but that is not new. All of the other manufacturers going turbo engines are completely new designs. The SCV6 comes from an 8 year old V8 that they neutered down for .. reasons.
 

Surfrider77

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Posts
900
Reaction score
127
I had a thread on this forum of my vehicle and talked about it there. Ultimately I bought the LR4 in the winter time and so once it started getting hot realized the AC wouldn't work. They replaced everything in the entire system at least once and it still wouldn't work. Talking to guys who still work at the dealership they all say they have never seen the issue again. I think it was the luck of the draw but between dealing with the dealership and the process of lemon lawing it the other half refused to have another one. Now today she says a different story as I think she really liked the LR4 and misses it as well.



Still say the dream would be the LR4 Body/Chassis, 50i BMW Engine, BMW iDrive and RRS active sway bars all put together in the LR4. Would be my ideal vehicle.




This really is a great list. I've thought about every one of these vehicles and yet I have a burning desire like @colorover to own a Raptor. Deep burning desire that every time I bring it up the misses ****** on and puts out. :bawling: Such a great blend of power, big tires, size, space and still a truck with a bed. Honestly really hoping the new Wrangler Pickup truck comes true as I think it would better suit my life/needs than a full sized truck.

Shame about the AC. Sounds like you did simply get a textbook lemon truck!

I agree with that dream setup. I have owned 3 different 50i BMW trucks ('12 X5, '13 X6 M Sport 450hp version, and the redesigned '14 X5). Amazing engines that perform and sound incredible. The iDrive should be industry standard for infotainment interfaces. Land Rover is notoriously horrible in this department, so any improvement would go a long way.

I keep looking at the new Raptor too. What is offered straight off the factory line is incredible. Though, as a daily driver, the thing is absolutely massive. Parking would suck here. Second and most importantly, at the end of the day it is nothing more than a pickup truck. $70k on a loaded up 2017 Raptor is a ton of money and it will depreciate FAST. The LR4s have held up extremely well in value over the years.
 

epiclr4

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Posts
618
Reaction score
11
I keep looking at the new Raptor too. What is offered straight off the factory line is incredible. Though, as a daily driver, the thing is absolutely massive. Parking would suck here. Second and most importantly, at the end of the day it is nothing more than a pickup truck. $70k on a loaded up 2017 Raptor is a ton of money and it will depreciate FAST. The LR4s have held up extremely well in value over the years.

Well, this is a debated topic in my mind as the previous Raptor didn't depreciate at all. If you were able to get one for sticker or less and put 40-50k miles on it, 4 years later you basically lost nothing. Wasn't until this new model started coming out that price came down. And to be honest, for a low mileage one of the final year or two of production prices are still only about $10k off from sticker on a dealer lot.

However, I do feel with Ford saying they will produce more Raptors this go round than last time and make it more available that it could potentially not hold value as well as the 1st Gen. That said, if people keep paying the $10k markup and you are able to source a dealership that will give it to you at sticker you should be ahead of the game for some time. Most dealers I have seen are going $5-10k markup. I refuse to pay it so I don't have one yet. Once the newness wears off and dealers need to move them for new model year and what not hopefully it will get more reasonable.
 

Surfrider77

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Posts
900
Reaction score
127
Well, this is a debated topic in my mind as the previous Raptor didn't depreciate at all. If you were able to get one for sticker or less and put 40-50k miles on it, 4 years later you basically lost nothing. Wasn't until this new model started coming out that price came down. And to be honest, for a low mileage one of the final year or two of production prices are still only about $10k off from sticker on a dealer lot.

However, I do feel with Ford saying they will produce more Raptors this go round than last time and make it more available that it could potentially not hold value as well as the 1st Gen. That said, if people keep paying the $10k markup and you are able to source a dealership that will give it to you at sticker you should be ahead of the game for some time. Most dealers I have seen are going $5-10k markup. I refuse to pay it so I don't have one yet. Once the newness wears off and dealers need to move them for new model year and what not hopefully it will get more reasonable.


There are people on the Raptor forum getting MSRP already. It will soon drop below that. The dealers asking markup are just wishful thinking at this point. I don't think it helps these new trucks loaded up wear a $70k MSRP sticker. That's quite a leap over the previous gen. Not sure how stateside values held up, but over here they depreciated just like any other truck. You can get a 2014 with low miles for about $30-$35k here.
 

epiclr4

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Posts
618
Reaction score
11
There are people on the Raptor forum getting MSRP already. It will soon drop below that. The dealers asking markup are just wishful thinking at this point. I don't think it helps these new trucks loaded up wear a $70k MSRP sticker. That's quite a leap over the previous gen. Not sure how stateside values held up, but over here they depreciated just like any other truck. You can get a 2014 with low miles for about $30-$35k here.

Completely not the case here. Wondered if your location was a differentiator or not. See the one in the link below. Sticker was probably $63k nearly 3 years ago and this model looks like it has every option ticked.

https://www.carmax.com/car/13979267
 

Surfrider77

Full Access Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Posts
900
Reaction score
127
That's crazy. Yea, different country.. different market pricing. I wish my LR4 was worth what it is back stateside!
 

bromhead

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Posts
265
Reaction score
9
I had a 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland with all the bells and whistles. It was LL after @7 months and I immediately bought my 2012 LR4. While on paper, the JGC looks great, at the highest setting, the suspension was atrocious, and things started breaking almost immediately. In fact, it was the suspension that was the final straw, it broke, and they simply couldn't fix it. I love my LR4 and am very grateful I got the v-8. I briefly test drove the D5 and was amazed at the level of luxury. With every version, LR becomes more like a RR, not exactly the direction I wanted. Clearly, it has become closer to the generic SUV's that it competes with, but I am unsure if its passed the tipping point. I do remember how jaded many of us where during the D2 to LR3 transition (no solid axles, tire underneath, not trail reparable, etc), perhaps the D5, given a chance, will grow on us. For now, if it wasn't for the diesel option, I wouldn't have much interest.
 

mpinco

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Posts
297
Reaction score
113
Location
Colorado
You are quoting an article from 2009. Don't know how you cut it, but that is not new. All of the other manufacturers going turbo engines are completely new designs. The SCV6 comes from an 8 year old V8 that they neutered down for .. reasons.

The JLR engine is hardly a dinosaur with direct injection, phasor cam timing and Roots technology. Now the DI/DII Buick engine was a dinosaur.

 

mpinco

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Posts
297
Reaction score
113
Location
Colorado
April auto sales were a bloodbath as inventories continue to rise. High prices from loaded vehicles are taking a toll.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
36,255
Posts
217,952
Members
30,493
Latest member
A562NV
Top