Troy A
Full Access Member
I looked really seriously at the LCs and just couldn't do it. I get that they're solid with massively long 300,000 mile / 25 year duty cycle engineering but not for $80K for a used one. Nuts.No disagreement at all about the LR4 being the last of its breed. I almost pulled the trigger on an almost new LC200, but just couldn't get to the point of liking the thing. The LR4 has orders of magnitude more refinement than the Toyota, and from reading the IH8MUD forums, they're also not immune from problems and repair costs seem to be similar to those for the LR. I think part of the reason Toyota has retained their reliability is through a lack of innovation, and just mild evolution of existing products. I was blown away when opening the door of the 200 to see a little push-button "door is closed" switch in plain view - I haven't owned a car in the last 15 years that had that old school technology! The product design of the 200's trunk is archaic compared to the LR4.
I have no intentions of getting rid of my LR4, but the dealerships up here in Washington certainly have a different point of view to what some of you have experienced. They keep sending me mail trying to convince me to switch in to a D5, offering a $22.5k trade for my 60k mile 2015 HSE Lux with HD pack.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk