- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Posts
- 813
- Reaction score
- 1
Oval sounds cool, but majority wins. Right now majority is for a winshield decal. Any other opinions?RoverChic said:
Decals???
- Thread starter Slam
- Start date
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Sergei
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2004
- Posts
- 827
- Reaction score
- 0
Well i dont like either one 
I.e oval is way overused and you also may get into certain issues with use of existing copyrighted art, blah blah.. Melissa and Andy may correct me on this one though
I cant find me graphic tablet - havent used it for too long and looks like it simply lost now. But i will try to draw sketch sometime this weekend , just so everyone can fuss on me too
I.e oval is way overused and you also may get into certain issues with use of existing copyrighted art, blah blah.. Melissa and Andy may correct me on this one though I cant find me graphic tablet - havent used it for too long and looks like it simply lost now. But i will try to draw sketch sometime this weekend , just so everyone can fuss on me too
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Posts
- 813
- Reaction score
- 1
It looks like a draw. Before we make any decisions we will have to see what everyone wants the most.
C
Cozmo
Guest
Sam you've got mail.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Posts
- 813
- Reaction score
- 1
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Posts
- 813
- Reaction score
- 1
I like the idea of logo7 the best, but it does say www.landroverworld.com instead of .org.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Posts
- 813
- Reaction score
- 1
Moose
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2004
- Posts
- 1,082
- Reaction score
- 2
That's what I was thinking, although there might be some copyright issues.
The standard (dare I say rule of thumb?) is whether the proposed scheme can be reasonably confused with the existing scheme, such that the existing scheme could be harmed in a business sense.
I know what you're thinking -- how do some stickers from a non-profit website harm LR's business? Well, it's simple: Every LRWO sticker bought is one LRSV sticker not bought. At least, that's what LRNA could claim.
That all said, it'd be difficult for LRNA to do much more than get injunctive relief, i.e., a court order to cease production and sale of the stickers. If all the stickers Sam had made were already sold, there's not much of a remedy.
SO: I vote for Tom's logo7.gif (with the .org) first, with the LRWO/LRSV sticker second.
Andy
PS: I am not acting as a lawyer on behalf of LRWO or Sam. This is just my opinion. Etc., Etc., Etc.
The standard (dare I say rule of thumb?) is whether the proposed scheme can be reasonably confused with the existing scheme, such that the existing scheme could be harmed in a business sense.
I know what you're thinking -- how do some stickers from a non-profit website harm LR's business? Well, it's simple: Every LRWO sticker bought is one LRSV sticker not bought. At least, that's what LRNA could claim.
That all said, it'd be difficult for LRNA to do much more than get injunctive relief, i.e., a court order to cease production and sale of the stickers. If all the stickers Sam had made were already sold, there's not much of a remedy.
SO: I vote for Tom's logo7.gif (with the .org) first, with the LRWO/LRSV sticker second.
Andy
PS: I am not acting as a lawyer on behalf of LRWO or Sam. This is just my opinion. Etc., Etc., Etc.
I vote on Tom. This way there will be no infringement on copyright law's/ patent's. As much as I like the "Special" Decals one; that is an original LRNA Sicker that needs to be purchased directly from the LR Dealership (and in addition they are not cheap). What are the dimensions or rather the size? Price point been negotiated yet ?
