2013-MY Rumors/Facts

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

manoftaste

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Posts
618
Reaction score
194
Not diggin it at all.

McGovern needs to stay on top of the redesign and keep that distinct architectural, minimalist, and product/industrial design look which sets the lr3/lr4 apart from the crowd.

He did a good job blingin up the LR3 (turned LR4) except the rear side bottom area (aft of rear wheel well) which looks like a funny-car tail end (stands out more with lighter colors). I am sure there could have been a better solution without a major re-tool. He might have gone for the current solution to keep the design consistent with FFRR and Sport but unfortunately the funny-car like straight edge doesn't work with the rest of LR4 design attributes.

And i really hope that in the next redesign they dont run any exhaust pipes etc under the rear axels. There should not be anything below or under the axels (both front and rear) in an off road vehicle.
 
Last edited:

mateored

Full Access Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Posts
135
Reaction score
3
From the C Pillar forward I give it a thumbs up! I'm not a fan of the sloped rear, akin to the Range Rover line. Keep it vertical in the rear. It's more functional that way.

Exactly. Could you imagine a Defender or a M-B G-Wagen with a sloped rear? Not utilitarian enough.
 

jwblue

Active Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Posts
26
Reaction score
0
what do you guys think of this picture?

discovery.jpg

Is this a concept?

Love the sleek look.
 

jjvd21

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Posts
576
Reaction score
35
That picture is a photoshop combo of an RRS and LR4.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
36,288
Posts
218,342
Members
30,502
Latest member
heather8635
Top