Sway bar disconnects

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

MilehighLR3

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Posts
154
Reaction score
0
During my recent intimate time spent with my LR's suspension, was wondering if anyone has attempted to sway disconnects. I could see where it would open up some additional travel.

Anyone ever try it on the LR3?
 

Trynian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Posts
836
Reaction score
9
I don't think you want to do that on the LR3. The swaybar helps keep the travel from going to far. If you travel any further then the current max the upper control arm will get really close to the shock if not start to contact it.
 

Mack73

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Posts
188
Reaction score
10
While I agree that excessive droop can be tied to the air bag damage, I still think there is a benefit to a disconnect. You would probably have to do some kind of limit straps, and maybe not even that, the sway bars are not the articulation limiter, it is built into the shock - but the benefit of the disconnect is to prevent articulation of one side affecting the other. That way you can achieve increased articulation from side to side.
 

Trynian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2008
Posts
836
Reaction score
9
While I agree that excessive droop can be tied to the air bag damage, I still think there is a benefit to a disconnect. You would probably have to do some kind of limit straps, and maybe not even that, the sway bars are not the articulation limiter, it is built into the shock - but the benefit of the disconnect is to prevent articulation of one side affecting the other. That way you can achieve increased articulation from side to side.

I agree if you did have a limiting strap that would help. I know the swaybars are not the limiter but they do help decrease the amount of hard downward pressure on the shock limiter which some of us have damaged when the swaybar link has been broken or damaged.
 

Houm_WA

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Posts
3,938
Reaction score
256
I just don't see it as necessary. We get a good amount of droop...and with the indi suspension we have about 12.5" of clearance down the middle.

The more you mess with things, the more you ask for trouble, IMO.
 

Mack73

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Posts
188
Reaction score
10
I just don't see it as necessary. We get a good amount of droop...and with the indi suspension we have about 12.5" of clearance down the middle.

The more you mess with things, the more you ask for trouble, IMO.

The only thing I disagree with is what the sway bar is doing, Remember me up on that rock, the side to side articulation was bad bad. With a disconnect, I bet it would have been much more level. But who knows.

Who is going to be the first to remove the sway bar ends and see what happens :)
 

blackforestham

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Posts
338
Reaction score
2
Have at it. I sure won't. With an IFS, the swaybar has a minimal effect on articulation. IF we were talking a solid axle - different story. Let's not kid ourselves...any form of rod-mod or computer manipulation of the height sensor FORCES more pressure into the canister resulting in MORE clearance and LESS articulation. I have the mod and crawl in NORMAL 90% of the time. It's equivalent to OEM OFFROAD MODE. This allows me to retain the OEM articulation performance as best as can be. I hit OFFROAD MODE when I need to clear obstacles, then throttle back to NORMAL for most trail work. Disconnecting the SB will have little effect on an IFS running 750psi in the can.
 

Houm_WA

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Posts
3,938
Reaction score
256
Yeah Jason but you didn't see us on the big rock on the last trip. Driver side was stuffed (on the rock) and the droop on the passenger side was pretty good.

All relative though I suppose...I just don't think there's much bang for the buck in there.
 

Mack73

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Posts
188
Reaction score
10
Yeah Jason but you didn't see us on the big rock on the last trip. Driver side was stuffed (on the rock) and the droop on the passenger side was pretty good.

All relative though I suppose...I just don't think there's much bang for the buck in there.

Stuffed...um no. See the pic below. My passenger side wheel should be stuffed atleast 2 more inches.

The goal of the disconnect is not droop on IFS. Lets walk through an example. OK we are going over a rock on the passenger side front. As you start to go up the rock, the wheel compresses. As it compresses the sway bar starts twisting. As it twists it starts lifting the other side. So instead of allowing the passenger side to compress fully to bump stops before "lifting" the truck, the sway bar starts the lifting much much earlier.

clif notes: sway bar causes the vehicle to lift before the wheel is compressed fully.

And here is the best example photos I can find, look at the increased ability to stuff the front wheel, maybe 2 more inches on the blaser.

2JustinsstockZR2Blazer.jpg

3JeremysZR2Blazer.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3859.jpg
    IMG_3859.jpg
    97.4 KB · Views: 21
Last edited:

Houm_WA

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Posts
3,938
Reaction score
256
So you are saying that the unsprung weight of the other-side wheel and tire would keep the compressed-side from getting further stuffed? I'm not sure I can mentally accept that.

Also...I meant the rock that Ryan, myself and Nasir climbed up last month in order to demonstrate the control-arm hitting the air shock...not your Tahuya example.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
36,270
Posts
218,106
Members
30,497
Latest member
TeriM
Top