How does the corrosion on the negative terminal make the leap to t-case ECU? I realize that corrosion is like cancer and will continue to spread until all affected parts have been completely cleaned or replaced. However, doesn't the corrosion spread via contact only? The reason I ask is because the negative terminal issue seems to be a problem for many of the people on this forum...
I actually don't know the answer to how it gets there, but apparently it makes its way there somehow. The severely damaged battery on the negative terminal when removed showed signs of white powdery residue all the way to its base and surroundings and who knows where else?
My understanding is that the ECUs are located right in that general area and corrosion probably makes a good suspect for the cause and faults related to the box.
Having said that, and after some research I found that this is not just an LR3 problem, this is a problem with most car makes and models, computers and Radio Towers etc; and the
CAUSE is:
Dissimilar Metals and Humidity (Moisture)
What really means here is that the LR3 and other automakers are not satisfying this engineering requirement to avoid corrosion.
ENGINEERING EXCERPT #1:
"Quality engineering and design requires an understanding of material compatibility. Galvanic corrosion (some times called dissimilar metal corrosion) is the process by which the materials in contact with each other oxidizes or corrodes. There are three conditions that must exist for galvanic corrosion to occur. First there must be two electrochemically dissimilar metals present. Second, there must be an electrically conductive path between the two metals. And third, there must be a conductive path for the metal ions to move from the more anodic metal to the more cathodic metal. If any one of these three conditions does not exist, galvanic corrosion will not occur. Often when design requires that dissimilar metals come in contact, the galvanic compatibility is managed by finishes and plating. The finishing and plating selected facilitate the dissimilar materials being in contact and protect the base materials from corrosion.
For harsh environments, such as outdoors, high humidity, and salt environments fall into this category. Typically there should be not more than 0.15 V difference in the "Anodic Index". For example; gold silver would have a difference of 0.15V being acceptable.
For normal environments, such as storage in warehouses or non-temperature and humidity controlled environments. Typically there should not be more than 0.25 V difference in the "Anodic Index".
For controlled environments, such that are temperature and humidity controlled, 0.50 V can be tolerated. Caution should be maintained when deciding for this application as humidity and temperature do vary from regions"
Source:
http://www.engineersedge.com/galvanic_capatability.htm
ENGINEERING EXCERPT #2:
What is Dissimilar Metal Corrosion?
Dissimilar metal corrosion is another way to define what is normally defined as Galvanic Corrosion or Bimetallic Corrosion.
Galvanic corrosion or Dissimilar metal Corrosion is a localised mechanism by which metals can be preferentially corroded.
This form of corrosion has the potential to attack junctions of metals, or regions where one construction metal is changed to another.
Frequently this condition arises because different metals are more easily fabricated into certain forms; an example might be a door frame manufactured from aluminium extrusions (aluminium extrudes extremely well into architectural sections), but with a door handle fabricated from stainless steel tube to exploit its higher strength and abrasion resistance.
Dissimilar metal corrosion is well known to most designers, specifiers and fabricators, but often the only rule in force is "don't mix metals".
Source:
http://www.corrosionist.com/dissimilar_metal_corrosion.htm
PREVENTION:
Corrosion Prevention
THE REAL SOLUTION:
After reading and research I am convinced that the TRUE solution lies in the DISSIMILAR METAL fix. I think if that is addressed then the problem will go away forever. Saw another YOUTUBE video about that and one comment stands out verifying the above:
The advantages of Gator Loc Connectors is that they will never corrode! With traditional battery connectors, including screw in terminals, there is the involvement of dissimilar metals,which over time will corrode (depending on environment) without consistent maintenance. In fact, I've seen screw in terminals (side-post type) corrode to a point where the engine would not turn over.
Because side-post terminals can hide real problems that can develop out of sight
Corrosion Free Battery Connectors
MY CONCLUSION:
Negative Terminal Corrosion is not related to any gases, acid leaks or such. It's purely an electrochemical process occuring between dissimilar metals under favorble (but undesirable) environments discussed in the first engineering article and re-iterated elsewhere in various forms.
Now the question is, are ECU contacts having the same problems? Maybe unrelated to the Negative Battery Terminal Corrosion but possibly the same phenomenon being experienced independent of battery? I have seen this in computers too, so my hypothesis is: "same phenomenon on ECU contacts but possibly unrelatd to terminal corrosion".