the gas OCTANE question....

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

xconcepts

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Posts
74
Reaction score
0
I asked this question to the tech at my local LR dealer. I was told that the only difference was the additives in it. They told me if you add a fuel cleaner probably once a month you won't notice a difference. I've been using 87 since I bought it, I did try 91 for a few weeks and there was no difference in milage. I am still at ~3.17/gal for 87 and ~3.40 for 91 though.
 

techboydino

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Posts
382
Reaction score
1
I asked this question to the tech at my local LR dealer. I was told that the only difference was the additives in it. They told me if you add a fuel cleaner probably once a month you won't notice a difference. I've been using 87 since I bought it, I did try 91 for a few weeks and there was no difference in milage. I am still at ~3.17/gal for 87 and ~3.40 for 91 though.


rich. good answer. <$5 savings for cheap gas just isnt worth it. not worth the possible dirty, weasel **** as the old man used to put it. ill stick to my sunoco 93.

xconcept, i thought about that theory a while back but knowing that your standard additive is about $5 or more, you arent saving anything overall except some cheap gas with some hocus pocus additive in it.

the real complaint is that now i spend $9 a gallon on my 103 race fuel. the camaro now gets 50/50 mix pump/race. used to be $5 a gallon. thats worth crying over.
 

colleyt

Active Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Posts
43
Reaction score
0
i appreciate the responses guys, thank you. the technical ones in particular have me thinking that although the cheaper gas may not hurt anything, what am i trying to achieve by running cheap gas and trying to save less than some of us spend on lunch. the ratio does close in the more expensive it gets too . never noticed that, good point.

a COROLLA? ummmmm no thanks. the more miles i have to drive the more i want to be in my LR. thats why i bought it. if im going to spend all that time behind the wheel i want to do it in a comfortable, reliable car with great visibility, all the creature comforts that we all enjoy and most importantly, that's SAFE (I drive home 5 days a week at 2am when bars close in hollywood). im gonna take the car that weighs a ton (safety), can get out of its own way (power wise) and can still fit easily into a compact parking spot. just thought i could save a few bucks a year by choosing a lower grade. oh well

oh and if I was in the UK..............
I probably wouldnt be driving as much and I would also be saving $240 a month on healthcare
 

nwoods

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Posts
1,675
Reaction score
24
oh and if I was in the UK..............
I probably wouldnt be driving as much and I would also be saving $240 a month on healthcare

And, you'd be driving a 35mpg diesel Disco III
 

tcpfl

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Posts
9
Reaction score
0
I've been praying for a diesel since 2001.
Maybe someday they'll get them cleaned up for the U.S.
Tom
 

grommet

Full Access Member
Joined
May 26, 2007
Posts
1,040
Reaction score
0
I asked this question to the tech at my local LR dealer. I was told that the only difference was the additives in it. They told me if you add a fuel cleaner probably once a month you won't notice a difference.
Yep, those excellent Land Rover dealers all employ internal combustion engine design engineers. :tongue: The fact is the engine was designed for a higher compression ratio to function "as designed", which can't be delivered by 87 octane in many environments/altitudes. But of course, we have many duplicate threads for this already...
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
36,718
Posts
222,732
Members
30,890
Latest member
Besi
Top