VTBike
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2016
- Posts
- 28
- Reaction score
- 3
Agreed if you are always on pavement or mild trails and only change settings at start of journey. "A few hundred miles" is the all you need. Doesn't take a lot of thinking. Less so when your running a difficult trail and need quick changes without taking your eyes off the goal. Between TR and D/S knobs the last thing you want to do is decode the array of options. I personally dislike knobs vs. column. Column shift is a 'feel' for what you have selected. Knob requires looking down. Two different sensory inputs. One efficient, one less so.
I totally respect what you're saying, I suppose I'm just unsure of where you're coming from. I have not driven any difficult trails, so I cannot offer the experience you do. I honestly don't understand the need to look down though, and the efficiency loss with the rotary knob. When anyone first learns driving with a column, knowing that it goes from Park through reverse, neutral, drive, etc.. is a learned muscle memory. With the column, you know you're in drive, and pushing it up goes to neutral, down to a lower gear or sport mode. Its the same with the knob - i don't need to look down to know a quick click to the left is neutral, a click to the right is sport mode (and then i can use the paddles to shift gears if i need to). More than that, I find the knob to shift so much faster and easier than a column. I would argue that it's more efficient by far than a column, simply because it's so relatively effortless and accurate.
So while I will validate that it's a personal preference thing, and agree with anyone who says that -- what I can't align with is the need to look down to shift with the rotary ***. It's simply not true. It's a learned muscle memory, just like it was when you were 17 or so learning to drive for the first time.
Is there something dramatically different that I'm just missing?