umbertob
Full Access Member
Report from one of the journalists and participants of a section of the expedition, with some interesting comments. This was posted on ExPo, so some of the content was in direct response to queries on that site about how modified the trucks that participated to this trip really were... Lots of skeptics on that forum. Re-posted without permission, hopefully Ray won't mind...
Wading into this thread a little late, but here goes.
I was on the trip from Nevada through to the Pacific. These were completely stock trucks, as you would get off the dealer floor.
LRNA actually had fifty 19" Goodyear MTRs in their warehouse, but they decided to go with the completely stock tires, just to be completely honest when they said the trucks were stock. I appreciate that they did, because it gives us an honest assessment of where the trucks' short-comings are, and the tires were the only issue.
There were actually 4 trucks in total on the trip.
Two trucks did the entire TAT, (as much as possible - we missed a dozen miles in Oregon due to forest fires).
The 3rd truck carried a camera crew. They did most of the trail but hopped off every once in awhile so they could upload images or film some side attractions along the route.
The 4th truck was just used as a shuttle to collect journalists from local airports and ferry them to the main two trucks that were doing the full TAT route.
None of the trucks had any breakdowns, and they didn't bring any spare parts along either. Tom had a basic tool kit along, and an extensive tire-repair kit. Yes there were multiple flat tires. Probably half due to driver error, and half due to the tires themselves.
It's interesting to talk about the tires. Every engineering solution is a series of compromises, and the reality is 99% of people who buy these cars want something quiet, comfortable and yet able to deal with a slippery driveway, a sudden storm, a trip up the ski-hill, and the like. For those conditions the stock tire is appropriate.
For those of us who use these vehicles more aggressively, the stock tire is not appropriate. LRNA knew that when they set off on the trip. And yet they decided to be honest about it and send it on the stock tires anyways. Even with journalists in the vehicles.
My take on the whole trip is that traveling on dirt roads across the USA is an amazing experience.
Is the TAT a hard-core, technical trail? For the most part, no. But then again, the sections of the Silk Web that I've driven haven't been very technical either. Neither is the Dempster highway up into the Arctic. Or most of the Pan-american highway.
The fact that the TAT even exists, as a cross-continent overland route, is fantastic. The fact that Land Rover has demonstrated that we (and our friends and families) can do the entire route in a good stock 4x4, is also fantastic. I'd love to see dozens of families hear about this trip, and set off next summer in a combination of Jeeps, Rovers, Suburbans, and whatever else they have. Hopefully with LR doing a good job of PR, more people in the US will realize this is possible.
ExPo member jessejman did it last year with his wife and 3 little kids in a 1994 Land Cruiser (http://www.expeditionportal.com/foru...-US-(and-back)) Maybe they didn't do the exact route, but the spirit was the same.
So, what did we learn from the Land Rover expedition?
There are lots of sharp rocks, so get good tires, know how to fix a flat, be precious of your sidewalls, and bring a couple of Jerry cans of fuel (yes we did actually need to use the Jerry cans, there are a couple of long stages).
Other than that, get out there and enjoy one of the world's last great overland routes while you can, because more of it is getting paved every single year.
*********
Ray Hyland
Explorers Club MI'12
COO - Overland International
www.expeditionportal.com
www.overlandjournal.com