davidfkon
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
- Posts
- 553
- Reaction score
- 4
so the Safari Guard and High Country are less . . . ??
Sturdy: protective; expesive . . . ???
Sturdy: protective; expesive . . . ???
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
i would like to see/hear more about the OEs . . .
any idea how rover specialty sliders compare to the offroving sliders?
'bout the same cost . . . do both do frame to sill with some kind of rail?
Go for it! The best possible thing that could happen to the LR3 market is more choices.
But you sorta phased out on the expensive part of the RS Sliders. More material is required, and significantly more labor than other traditional designs. As for margin, its nil. Everyone involved in making and distributing them has lost money. This is primary due to shipping debacles (sent to wrong country, or impounded by Customs, etc...) and customer service related fulfillment challenges (LR's quality control, related to the subframe members leaves a lot to be desired!) that have erroded the profit margin.
THere are much less expensive options out there, such as HighCountry and SafariGard (as soon as Casey gets back from Iraq), but they do not compare to the RS product in feature in or execution. You aren't driving a Toyota anymore.
so the Safari Guard and High Country are less . . . ??
Sturdy: protective; expesive . . . ???
As to what I do and my knowledge of material costs, I'm in architecture, and steel is bought by the pound/ton. I really have no idea about small quanties associated with fab stuff. But I assume that a product with three times as much steel will cost 3x as much also, pound for pound.