285/60R18 Truth or Fiction?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Steve T

Active Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Posts
44
Reaction score
24
Location
Annapolis MD
Stock 2011 LR4 opting with 18x8.5 wheels with offset 45mm.

some say they run this size with no rubbing and some say otherwise. it may depend on the brand and type tire.. can anyone shed light? open to options...i've already been talked out of 20's :)

using Gap iiD tool to lift but width may cause issue on frame and front/rear well? not interested in spacers.

Considering Cooper Zeons, Discoverer STT Max, KO2, Nitto ridge grapplers. - open to options

any pictures of the 285's mounted on the truck would be helpful also...
 

BikePilot

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2018
Posts
184
Reaction score
72
Location
Golden Colorado (USA)
265/60r18 st Maxx (great tires btw) fit without rubbing on my 2011 LR4, but there is very little surplus clearance in the wheelwells and no extra clearance in the spare tire well. I'm pretty sure that a 285/60 would not fit in the spare tire well and would rub the wheelwells . Possibly it could work with modifications, but pretty sure it won't work on a stock truck.

Lifting with the gap tool or rods will not help with tire fit . The suspension still compresses to the same point in the travel though it may droop more with the lift which could cause rub where you wouldn't get it without the lift. It is possible to run limit straps to control droop and spacers to reduce uptravel which may allow fitting bigger tires. For my purposes I'd rather have a slightly smaller tire and full suspension travel and function than sacrifice some suspension performance for tire size.
 

jwest

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Posts
2,041
Reaction score
409
Location
Seattle WA
I used 285/60-18 nitto terra grappler as my first tire on a factory 18x8. no rubbing and it fit fine in spare space with that shield removed.

No rubbing up front on stock bumper/fender liner, but it's possible the tiny difference in offset allowed this. 53 on an 8" vs your idea of 45 ET on an 8.5" which will be wider both due to offset by 8mm and also due to the wheel adding 1/4" more to the outward face. for example, if you had an 8.5" ET 53 wheel, it's added width for clearance concerns would be 1/2 of the extra width, so 1/4". So, take 6mm + 8mm and you've more or less added 14mm to where the swing radius will occur during turning.

Due to the same reasons, there could be contact of the inside edge of the upper rear fender flare/liner during 100% compression. Maybe not, but it will be close.

Don't put a 285 on a wider offset wheel on your vehicle though thinking you'll decide then because it'll look so cool you'll talk yourself into using it no matter how bad the rubs are ;)

Proportionally, the 285 is the line where tires look seriously awesome on the lr3/4 body style especially if flush to the fender flares.

I don't have rubbing on mine but they are 275/65-18 on an 8" but also with a 25mm spacer. 285 is quite a bit wider though and mine has all the mods needed and an aftermarket front bumper which allows more room.

Consider that in almost all off road situations and surfaces, a narrower taller tire will perform better. You can fit a 265/65-18 no problem. You can do a few mods and use a 265/70 or 275/65. 285 gets you no performance off road actually, just looks.

A taller narrower tire will make a long patch when using low psi and crawl onto things rather than how a wide tire will tend to push stuff in front of it. Proportionally speaking of course. We can't fit massive wide tires that are also proportionally tall and with a huge long patch when aired down.

If you think from a view of maximum patch area, our vehicle with it's limitations requires the skinnier but tall approach.

I know you're trying the 8.5 because it's one of the few easy bolt-on 18" choices. Just know that both measurements are reducing the maximum allowable size because both aspects push the outer edge further out than a factory 8" with ET 53 so you'll have to compromise with either the width or height unless you do certain mods to the vehicle.

I would expect 265/65-18 to work but just barely on that 8.5" wheel and offset. Surely someone has a compomotive with exact tire to give feedback.
 

Houm_WA

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Posts
3,938
Reaction score
256
You'll also want to relocate the EAS wiring in the driver's side wheel well....frame-mounted, if it's the same as on the LR3.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Posts
7
Reaction score
0
Location
Sudbury MA
I recently put 285/60 R18s on my LR4 with 1.5" Johnson Rod lift setup, and I would say I am not happy with the results. The width of the tire causes rubbing on the "frame horns" that is pretty pronounced. The 285 width also is a bit wide/bulgy for the overall look of the truck. Thankfully, Sullivan Tire here in Boston area has a return 30 day guarantee and I am downsizeing to 265/60s.
 

ryanjl

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Posts
3,032
Reaction score
1,803
Location
KCMO
265/65 would be the sweet spot.

The johnson rods probably make your problem worse.
 

jmars

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Posts
74
Reaction score
26
Your rods are the culprit. Rods don’t change the wheel well/ control arm clearance
 

ryanjl

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Posts
3,032
Reaction score
1,803
Location
KCMO
I would love to hear why yoy think so as I would think the opposite from this perspecive.

Thx

Ian

Because of the way an independent suspension is designed, extending everything further downward in the travel draws the wheel in closer to the frame.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
36,260
Posts
218,017
Members
30,496
Latest member
washburn72
Top