FYI people, without very obvious fender cutting and arch trim relocation (you'd be able to notice it immediately) 34's DO NOT "fit" and more than you could say a size 9 shoe fits if you actually are a size 11. Could you get it 'on', sure sort of, but could you do a hike, doubt it.
Anyway, it annoys the heck out of me these newbies pop up saying **** "fits" and then double down by saying the tires stuff into the fenders on articulation... NO THEY DO NOT.
Want proof? Nah, they never show it but here ya go and this is only a 33" with a narrower tread and section width on a 8" rim vs 9", meaning, this 'fits' way better and guess what, it doesn't actually really 'fit':
32" 275/65-18 and 33" 275/70-18. Essentially same tread width which is where the fender stuffing is our biggest initial tight spot during articulation. Wider, like 295 is all sorts of trouble compounded by using spacers, it's simply ludicrous to suggest they fit.
Hers is the 275/70 with white letters out so I can easily keep track of 33 vs 32 in photos
This is in contact and it's not using the full articulation. Note again, this 275/70 is about 2" narrower than the 295 tire mentioned and about 1/2 less in radius. Note if this were wider and taller, there would be no way to stuff up into the fender edge.
Testing in the front was also done both with and without 30mm spacers. Adding any spacer makes all aspects of clearances worse except for the UCA gap which is not required up to 285/60 just barely but would be required on taller/wider sections like 285/70.
Even the wider section width of the Duratrac 275/70 barely cleared the UCA on a bit of strut droop like is often encountered even in mild off roading.
The BFG AT KO2 is actually a fairly trim shaped tire with much less section buldge compared to the Duratrac but they both had almost equal tread width: