cperez
Full Access Member
Here's my story which may be more of a thought exercise:
I recently had a slow leak in one of my rear OEM Continentals. Upon inspection, my trusted indie LR shop noted that it was a failing internal patch from a previous puncture (I bought this MY'11 as a pre-owned vehicle). They were reluctant to re-patch it for safety/liability reasons and I concurred.
The OEM tires had about 40-50% life remaining so I wasn't crazy about replacing all of them because of this single leaker. It wasn't a huge budget issue but just seemed wasteful to me. The shop agreed that it would make sense to only buy one new pair, which I did and which they mounted/balanced/aligned for me. Incidentally I purchased two Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus as the new pair, obviously in the same size as the OEM Contis.
A few weeks later I was in the dealership for a few warranty items. The service consultant noted the two Bridgestones and asked about them. I explained the history above. He said that I should consider a fully matched set of tires with similar wear cycles because even a few 32's of an inch in diameter difference could cause issues in the front and rear differentials. On paper his theory made sense to me but I had to wonder if it mattered in the real world. Another tech I spoke with upon pickup seemed to agree with me.
Today while perusing the forum I saw a bumped thread about tire pressures which referenced LR's own specifications calling for higher PSI in the rear. This brought my situation to mind-- wouldn't different front/rear PSIs also create different tire circumferences? (albeit small but measurable). If so does this make the dealership tech's point moot?
I'd be interested in your thoughts. In practical terms is this something that would concern you?--
a) Having 2 brands of properly sized tires installed (aesthetics aside)
b) Having minimally different circumferences between front and rear tires (either due to wear or PSI)
Chris
I recently had a slow leak in one of my rear OEM Continentals. Upon inspection, my trusted indie LR shop noted that it was a failing internal patch from a previous puncture (I bought this MY'11 as a pre-owned vehicle). They were reluctant to re-patch it for safety/liability reasons and I concurred.
The OEM tires had about 40-50% life remaining so I wasn't crazy about replacing all of them because of this single leaker. It wasn't a huge budget issue but just seemed wasteful to me. The shop agreed that it would make sense to only buy one new pair, which I did and which they mounted/balanced/aligned for me. Incidentally I purchased two Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus as the new pair, obviously in the same size as the OEM Contis.
A few weeks later I was in the dealership for a few warranty items. The service consultant noted the two Bridgestones and asked about them. I explained the history above. He said that I should consider a fully matched set of tires with similar wear cycles because even a few 32's of an inch in diameter difference could cause issues in the front and rear differentials. On paper his theory made sense to me but I had to wonder if it mattered in the real world. Another tech I spoke with upon pickup seemed to agree with me.
Today while perusing the forum I saw a bumped thread about tire pressures which referenced LR's own specifications calling for higher PSI in the rear. This brought my situation to mind-- wouldn't different front/rear PSIs also create different tire circumferences? (albeit small but measurable). If so does this make the dealership tech's point moot?
I'd be interested in your thoughts. In practical terms is this something that would concern you?--
a) Having 2 brands of properly sized tires installed (aesthetics aside)
b) Having minimally different circumferences between front and rear tires (either due to wear or PSI)
Chris